To Leave or Not to Leave? The Dilemma of Journalists on X (Formerly Twitter)

In recent years, X (formerly Twitter) has undergone dramatic transformations, sparking debate among journalists worldwide. Once a vital tool for news gathering, networking, and audience engagement, the platform has become increasingly controversial under its new leadership. The changes in content moderation, the rise of misinformation, and the shifting priorities of the algorithm have left journalists questioning whether they should continue using it or seek alternative platforms.

For international correspondents, this question is particularly pressing. Their work relies on access to real-time updates, engagement with diverse sources, and the ability to amplify critical global issues. But at what cost? Should journalists continue using X despite its challenges, or is it time to move on?

This article explores the pros and cons of remaining on X, alternative platforms to consider, and strategies for managing a digital presence in an evolving media landscape.

The Case for Staying on X

Despite its recent controversies, X remains a powerful platform for journalists. Here’s why some believe it’s still worth using:

1. Real-Time News and Global Reach

X continues to be one of the fastest platforms for breaking news. Whether it’s a natural disaster, a political crisis, or a major international development, updates often appear on X before they reach traditional news outlets. For foreign correspondents covering fast-moving events, leaving X could mean losing access to immediate, on-the-ground information.

2. Source Discovery and Networking

Many journalists rely on X to identify sources, track expert opinions, and engage with government officials, NGOs, and fellow correspondents. It remains a space where crucial interviews can be arranged quickly and where policymakers often make statements directly.

3. Audience Engagement and Visibility

For journalists who have built their reputation on X, leaving the platform could mean losing a direct connection with their audience. The ability to share articles, provide analysis, and interact with readers in real time is valuable—especially for international correspondents seeking to elevate global stories that might otherwise be overlooked.

4. Limited Alternatives with Similar Influence

While other platforms exist, none have fully replicated the influence X holds in journalism. LinkedIn, Mastodon, Threads, and Bluesky offer spaces for discussion, but none provide the same real-time information flow and professional network that X has cultivated over the years.

The Case for Leaving X

While X still holds advantages, its downsides are increasingly hard to ignore. Here’s why many journalists are considering leaving:

1. Misinformation and Content Moderation Concerns

The platform’s approach to content moderation has shifted significantly, leading to concerns about the spread of misinformation and hate speech. The relaxation of policies has allowed conspiracy theories, propaganda, and harassment to flourish, making it harder for journalists to navigate safely.

2. Algorithmic Changes and Declining Engagement

Many journalists have noticed a decline in engagement, with algorithmic changes prioritizing paid content and certain viewpoints over organic reach. Verified status, once a mark of credibility, is now tied to a paid subscription model, making it harder for audiences to distinguish credible sources from disinformation peddlers.

3. Toxic Environment and Harassment

Journalists—particularly women and reporters covering sensitive topics—have long faced harassment on X. With reduced content moderation and the reinstatement of previously banned accounts, the risk of online abuse has increased. For many, the mental toll of staying on the platform outweighs the professional benefits.

4. Declining Relevance in the Media Ecosystem

The dominance of X in digital journalism is waning. Many news organizations have reduced their presence on the platform, and audiences are diversifying across multiple social networks. Some argue that journalists should proactively engage with newer platforms rather than investing time in one that is in decline.

Alternative Platforms for Journalists

For those considering a move away from X, several alternatives offer potential:

1. Mastodon

A decentralized social network that has gained popularity among journalists seeking an ad-free, non-algorithmic platform. While its user base is smaller, it offers strong privacy controls and better content moderation.

2. Bluesky

Developed by Twitter’s co-founder Jack Dorsey, Bluesky aims to recreate the best aspects of X without its current issues. Still in beta, it has attracted journalists and public figures looking for an alternative.

3. Threads (by Meta)

Meta’s answer to X, Threads is integrated with Instagram and has quickly gained users. While still evolving, it offers a familiar microblogging experience with the potential for mass adoption.

4. LinkedIn

For professional discussions and industry networking, LinkedIn has become a valuable space for journalists. While it lacks real-time news updates, it allows for in-depth analysis and audience engagement.

5. Telegram and WhatsApp Communities

Some journalists are turning to messaging apps for secure discussions and breaking news alerts. Telegram, in particular, has become a key platform for reporters covering war zones and crisis situations.

Managing a Multi-Platform Strategy

Rather than an all-or-nothing decision, journalists can adopt a multi-platform approach to maintain flexibility. Here are some strategies:

• Diversify Presence: Maintain accounts on multiple platforms and gradually shift focus based on where the audience migrates.

• Use X Selectively: Limit engagement to essential updates while relying on other platforms for deeper discussions.

• Leverage Newsletters and Websites: Build direct connections with audiences through personal newsletters (e.g., Substack) and independent websites.

• Engage in Private Networks: Participate in journalist-specific groups on Slack, Discord, or private forums for secure discussions.

Should Journalists Stay or Go?

There is no one-size-fits-all answer. For international correspondents, the decision depends on their reporting needs, risk tolerance, and audience engagement strategies. Those covering breaking news may find X indispensable, while others focused on analysis and commentary might thrive on newer platforms.

Ultimately, the landscape of digital journalism is shifting, and adaptability is key. Whether journalists stay on X or move elsewhere, the core mission remains the same: delivering accurate, impactful, and responsible journalism in an ever-changing media environment.